Concise Cyber

Subscribe below for free to get these delivered straight to your inbox

Advertisements
Perplexity Rejects SquareX’s ‘Backdoor’ Claim in Public Dispute Over Comet Browser
Advertisements

A public dispute has emerged between browser security firm SquareX and AI search engine company Perplexity regarding an alleged security vulnerability in Perplexity’s Comet browser extension. SquareX has labeled the issue a critical flaw, while Perplexity maintains it is an intended feature and not a vulnerability.

SquareX Alleges Critical Vulnerability

Vivek Ramachandran, the founder and CEO of SquareX, published a blog post and a demonstration video detailing the alleged security issue. According to Ramachandran, the vulnerability could permit a malicious website to access and exfiltrate sensitive user data from other open tabs, including content from Gmail, Google Docs, and WhatsApp Web. He characterized the issue as a “backdoor” into users’ private information. SquareX stated that it had reported its findings to Perplexity on May 17.

Perplexity’s Firm Rebuttal

Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas issued a strong rebuttal to SquareX’s claims, stating that the behavior described is not a security vulnerability but an intended feature. Srinivas explained that the Comet extension requests user permission to access page content upon installation to provide contextual AI-powered answers. He specified that for any data to be accessed, a user would need to be on a malicious website and then explicitly click the Comet extension button to activate it on that page. Perplexity’s engineering team also published a technical blog post to refute the claims. Srinivas asserted that no user data had been compromised, there was no backdoor, and accused the competing firm of sensationalizing the issue for marketing purposes.

All articles are written here with the help of AI on the basis of openly available information which cannot be independently verified. We do strive to quote the relevant sources.The intent is only to summarise what is already reported in public forum in our own wordswith no intention to plagarise or copy other person’s work.The publisher has no intent to defame or cause offence to anyone, any person or any organisation at any moment.The publisher assumes no responsibility for any damage or loss caused by making decisions on the basis of whatever is published on cyberconcise.com.You’re advised to do your own checks and balances before making any decision, and owners and publishers at cyberconcise.com cannot be held accountable for its resulting ramifications.If you have any objections, concerns or point out anything factually incorrect, please reach out using the form on https://concisecyber.com/about/

Discover more from Concise Cyber

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading